Location of Repository

Core competencies for diversifying: case study of a small business

By Colin Wheeler, Paul Trott and T. Maddocks

Abstract

This paper addresses a significant gap within the present body of work on the resource-based view of the firm: the lack of empirical research on the resource-based perspective within the SME sector (Newbert, 2007). This study applies the resource-based view and core competencies analysis in a very practical situation: a small manufacturing firm in the UK. The study is the result of a two-year ‘action research’ project where the researcher was embedded within the firm. he manufacturing firm supplies hydraulic tube assemblies to the yellow construction industry and has experienced rapid growth over the past 10 years. Using a causal mapping methodology the findings reveal distinctive capabilities that the firm is able to use as a basis for diversification into the leisure marine industry. The findings contribute to the body of literature on the resource-based view of the firm by providing a methodological approach which helps to uncover core competencies in practice.

Topics: Business and Management, Marketing, Advertising and Sales
Year: 2009
DOI identifier: 10.1002/jsc.829
OAI identifier: oai:eprints.port.ac.uk:2111
Provided by: Parade@Portsmouth

download Get cached PDF (170.5 kB)

  1. K Conner. (1991). A Historical Comparison of Resource-Based Theory and Five Schools of Thought Within Industrial Organization Economics: Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm?"
  2. A J Scavarda, T Bouzdine-Chameeva, S M Goldstein, J M Hays and A V Hill. (2006). A Methodology for Constructing Collective Causal Maps, Decision Sciences,
  3. B Wernerfelt. (1984). A resource based view of the firm,
  4. O V Pavlov and K Saeed. (2004). A resource-based analysis of peer-to-peer technology,
  5. R R Nelson and S G Winter. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change.
  6. J Mills and K Platts. (2001). Applying resource-based theory: methods, outcomes and utility for managers",
  7. Gibbert M 2006b Munchausen. Black Swans, and the RBV: Response to Levitas and Ndofor,
  8. N Petts. (1997). Building growth on core competences – a practice approach",
  9. M Bougon and K Weick. (1977). Cognition in organizations: an analysis of the Utrecht Jazz Orchestra."
  10. G Hamel and C K Prahalad. (1994). Competing for the future’,
  11. C Eden. (2006). Core competence analysis, Seminar held at
  12. K Zhang Y Hafeez and N Malak. (2002). Core competence for sustainable competitive advantage: A structured methodology for identifying core competence;
  13. C Marshall and G B Rossman. (1989). Designing Qualitative research.
  14. D J Teece, G Pisano and A Shuen. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic Management,
  15. S L Newbert. Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research,
  16. J Barney. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage,’
  17. M Gibbert. (2006). Generalizing about uniqueness: An essay on an apparent paradox in the Resource-Based View,
  18. D Clark. (2000). Implementation issues in core competence strategy making,
  19. S Howick, F Ackermann and D Andersen. (2006). Linking event thinking with structural thinking: methods to improve client value in projects,
  20. R A Johnson. (1976). Management, systems, and society: an introduction. Pacific Palisades, Calif.: Goodyear Pub.
  21. C Eden and F Ackerman. (2000). Mapping distinctive competencies: a systemic approach,
  22. J Homer and R Oliva. (2001). Maps and models in system dynamics: a response to Coyle,
  23. C Fiol and A Huff. (1992). Maps for Managers: Where are we? Where do we go from here?”
  24. M J Rouse and U S Daellenbach. (2002). More thinking on research methods for the resourcebased perspective.
  25. S Onyeiwu. (2003). Some determinants of core competencies: Evidence from a Binary-Logit Analysis,
  26. G Dosi. (1982). Technical paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change’,
  27. E T Penrose. (1959). The theory of the firm.
  28. Ed Levitas and H A Ndofor. (2006). What to do with the resource-based view? A few suggestions for what ails the RBV that supporters and opponents might accept.
  29. J Galbreath and P Galvin. (2004). Which resources matter? A fine grained test of the resourcebased view of the firm, Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings,

If you think this content is not provided as Open Access according to the BOAI definition then please contact us immediately.